top of page
This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.Start Now

EDITING ARTICLES

As an editor, much of my time is spent reading articles and ensuring they are at Carlmont's standards for publication. Editing allows me to see other writing styles and learn what I can do better by reading what others do. I do my best to give constructive feedback to my writers and work with them if they are struggling with any part of the article process. It is important to me that I help my writers hone their journalism skills, and I hold that to myself when providing feedback. While being firm in meeting the Scot Scoop standards, I still make sure I am approachable and accommodating to foster a good relationship between myself and my writers. 

​

As a writer myself, I go through many revisions of my articles before handing them off to my editor. I consider it essential to thoroughly draft, edit, and revise all my writing so I am always showing my best work. 

WHAT I CONSIDER/EDITING CRITERIA

  1. Writing flow; Does the transition between grafs and quotes make sense? How can I make this read smoother; what sentences are too long, too short, or choppy?​

  2. Reader interest; Does this work keep the reader engaged the whole time? What is the angle of the work?

  3. AP Style; In addition to following Scot Scoop standards, does this work follow all AP style guidelines?

  4. Accuracy; Are all names, pronouns, grade levels, and facts accurate? What needs to be done to increase the credibility of the work?

  5. Sourcing; Do the sources represent multiple different points of view? Who's thoughts are missing from this work?

bottom of page